A body and mind is relative to one another. To think you live a theory while your body is not adherent to a proposition is to live 'rich', where 'rich' can incur the idea call "waste", "erosion" and "age". This is a provision to having a orgasm and not look at your genitalia as ugly and adulterously uncontrollable.

To walk each step of the mind is to concurrent with a amphibious idea called Artifical intelligence. And, each step prolonged is to be a certainty where a term most people recognise 'safety' becomes relative to abnormality and religion. The oppose is not true when nature takes the 'step-walk' as passage of survival in a degree of theory that adhere to natural outcomes.

This is the idea of ‘rich’ breaks away from survival and becomes safety. Rich assumes safety, but as a reflected consumption such as the alleged theory of I.R.A.N. enriching Uranium. Whom on earth prefers survival in nature as a conclusion and chooses 'safety' when it can cost another their life?

 

Safety, is a model of comfort and comparative 'real' where if you were to estate it you build land devices ( mines where Lady Diana tried to remove ), and then permanent dwelling places as much as walks and roofs can be used as a boundary.

 As stated many times, my survival is based on being heterosexual and living in my mum’s memory, and such after eleven years ‘renewing my mum’s memory’ am afford led naturally to move into a permanent dwelling place where my research will take a beginning with my mum’s memory and what I have achieved from it.

 

It did not cost my mums memory anything, and added fruit to see how she loved me. Much to I.R.A.N. where their mother is Islam and you have to wonder whether survival was their first thought?